The section reflect usual structure of academic work: publications, research projects, conferences, professional service (yes, I agree to serve as a peer-reviewer for journals and publishing houses in my field of research and usually I’m not the “second reviewer” type 🙂 ).

As a researcher, I both benefit and suffer from my transdisciplinary forms of inquiry which does not easily conform to the usual categories of academic work nor metrics-based forms of assessing the academic “excellence”. I’ve always been situated at the crossroads of academic and non-academic, practice-based forms of reflection and I continue to transgress boundaries, move back and forth, and fail expectations (mine and others).